Pivot!


Hello! I hope your week is going splendidly!

I'm dropping in to your inbox today to explain some of the changes to the newsletter that I am implementing, starting…this week.

I have been thinking a lot about the newsletter’s goals and what people appear to find valuable. As a result, I’ll be making some changes to content and structure that I hope will lead to something you find even more valuable 🤞.

The TL;DR version

The thematic focus on Russian security issues will be the same, but the type of content will be different. The newsletter will also have a new name: Tracing Patterns.

The longer version

I appreciate you being here, and I don’t take your time for granted. That means I want the newsletter to deliver maximum value to you.

Recently, I have mainly been providing roundups of reporting. I know some of you find these useful, but they can be quite dry – there are only so many ways that you can say someone has been sentenced to prison! – and they don’t offer much opportunity for me to add value. Plus, I look at what you share and comment on, and media roundups aren’t what garners the most engagement.

As such, I’m ditching the roundup of developments. I’ll still be posting regularly on Bluesky, so you can follow me there if you still want that type of material (I've abandoned Twitter for obvious ethical reasons).

Instead, I’m going to focus on where I can leverage original data, add context to a story, or offer a unique perspective. The goal of each issue will be to take a particular story and unpack it, examining the relationships of those involved, analysing the underlying trends, exploring the broader context, and explaining the meaning of it all.

What this looks like will vary. It could be something like last week’s exploration of what the war means for the North Caucasus, or it could be a deep dive on a particular issue or group — as you will see this Friday. But I will try to develop a standard structure so the newsletter is easy to skim. This may require some experimentation to find out what works, so bear with me!

The core focus of the newsletter will remain the same. i.e. the story I pick will come from the world of Russian security, with a particular focus on terrorism & political violence, private military companies, and state-linked security services. And I’ll especially be trying to show the ways in which trend data and network analysis can help us understand these issues.

The new name for the newsletter, Tracing Patterns, is intended to reflect this focus. When you see this pop up in your inbox, you now know what it is!

If this pivot no longer appeals to you, then you’ll find the unsubscribe bottom at the end of the email. But I really hope you’ll stay!

113 Cherry St #92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2205
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Threatologist

My newsletter provides analysis and insights on terrorism & insurgency, private military companies, and state-linked security services in Russia. I provide research on Russia and academic editing services.

Read more from Threatologist
Logo of Tracing Patterns

Welcome to the very first issue of Tracing Patterns, the newsletter that takes a particular story from the world of security and unpacks it — examining the relationships of those involved, analysing the underlying trends, exploring the broader context, and explaining the meaning of it all. In case you missed the announcement on Wednesday, this is what will be replacing Threat Dissection/Threat Monitor, in an effort to bring even more value to your inbox! This week, I’ll be focusing on the...

Threat Dissection banner

The costs of the war in Ukraine for the North Caucasus Russian investigative media outlet Mediazona have published their latest dataset on Russia’s losses in its war on Ukraine. The headline figure is that they have identified 95,300 soldiers killed, including foreigners and volunteers. But what does the data say about the costs of the war for the North Caucasus? First, let’s look at the geographical distribution: Stavropol leads the way with 1,480 casualties, slightly ahead of Dagestan...

Prediction is a fool’s game. Try scenario planning instead. Policy makers often want to know what will happen. The problem: even experts aren’t very good at guessing. People can be right for the wrong reasons, and wrong for the right ones. They can be either the proverbial stopped clock or suffer the fate of Cassandra. There is a lot of analytical shooting-from-the-hip out there, and plenty of people offer pretty awful predictions without any sort of mea culpa when they don't come true (I...